Ravenpelt
Ravenpelt's Profile
Ravenpelt's Profile
| Username | Ravenpelt | Gender | Male |
| Date Joined | Location | Russia | |
| Last Updated | Occupation | Eliminating Nazis | |
| Last visit | # Pictures | 0 | |
| # Comments Given | 1260 |
Member Info
Member Info

http://www.bannedsite.com/index.php/FanArt_Central
TAKE THE TEST!
Here is the 'Am I A Creationist?' Test:
1. Are science, logic, observable data, and rationality, completely and utterly incorrect?
2. Is God correct?
3. Am I right?
If you answered yes to all these questions you are a creationist. Congratulations on ignoring fact
Is god willing to prevent evil but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him god?
According to a study by Paul Bell, published in the UK Mensa Magazine in 2002, there is an inverse correlation between religiosity and intelligence. Analyzing 43 studies carried out since 1927, Bell found that all but four reported such a connection, and he concluded that "the higher one's intelligence or education level, the less one is likely to be religious or hold 'beliefs' of any kind."
Bell, Paul. "Would you believe it?" Mensa Magazine, UK Edition, Feb. 2002, pp. 12–13
If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time
TAKE THE TEST!
Here is the 'Am I A Creationist?' Test:
1. Are science, logic, observable data, and rationality, completely and utterly incorrect?
2. Is God correct?
3. Am I right?
If you answered yes to all these questions you are a creationist. Congratulations on ignoring fact
Is god willing to prevent evil but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him god?
According to a study by Paul Bell, published in the UK Mensa Magazine in 2002, there is an inverse correlation between religiosity and intelligence. Analyzing 43 studies carried out since 1927, Bell found that all but four reported such a connection, and he concluded that "the higher one's intelligence or education level, the less one is likely to be religious or hold 'beliefs' of any kind."
Bell, Paul. "Would you believe it?" Mensa Magazine, UK Edition, Feb. 2002, pp. 12–13
If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time
faves_faves
Comments
You are not authorized to comment here. Your must be registered and logged in to comment
DianaTiger on May 30, 2007, 11:59:24 AM
DianaTiger on
Comment Deleted
Ravenpelt on May 30, 2007, 8:54:08 PM
Ravenpelt on
DianaTiger on May 31, 2007, 12:04:47 AM
DianaTiger on
Comment Deleted
Ravenpelt on May 31, 2007, 5:53:30 AM
Ravenpelt on
DianaTiger on May 30, 2007, 11:50:43 AM
DianaTiger on
Comment Deleted
Benk on May 30, 2007, 1:24:26 PM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
Benk on May 29, 2007, 3:06:51 PM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
Ravenpelt on May 29, 2007, 8:48:50 PM
Ravenpelt on
SonicTheHedgehogAddict on May 29, 2007, 11:37:39 AM
Comment Deleted
rileywolf on May 29, 2007, 5:18:20 AM
rileywolf on
Ravenpelt on May 29, 2007, 5:30:16 AM
Ravenpelt on
rileywolf on May 29, 2007, 6:40:59 AM
rileywolf on
Ravenpelt on May 29, 2007, 7:33:51 AM
Ravenpelt on
rileywolf on May 29, 2007, 9:01:21 AM
rileywolf on
Benk on May 29, 2007, 10:06:41 AM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
rileywolf on May 30, 2007, 7:59:42 AM
rileywolf on
Ravenpelt on May 30, 2007, 11:39:38 AM
Ravenpelt on
rileywolf on May 30, 2007, 12:29:07 PM
rileywolf on
Benk on May 30, 2007, 1:24:47 PM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
rileywolf on May 31, 2007, 3:55:46 AM
rileywolf on
Benk on May 31, 2007, 4:58:29 AM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
Ravenpelt on May 31, 2007, 6:12:52 AM
Ravenpelt on
rileywolf on May 31, 2007, 7:37:42 AM
rileywolf on
Benk on May 31, 2007, 7:50:49 AM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
rileywolf on May 31, 2007, 8:15:55 AM
rileywolf on
Benk on May 31, 2007, 8:55:26 AM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
DianaTiger on June 1, 2007, 7:08:29 AM
DianaTiger on
Comment Deleted
Benk on June 1, 2007, 7:11:10 AM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
rileywolf on June 1, 2007, 7:39:42 AM
rileywolf on
rileywolf on June 1, 2007, 7:40:42 AM
rileywolf on
rileywolf on May 31, 2007, 8:16:39 AM
rileywolf on
Ravenpelt on May 31, 2007, 8:49:44 AM
Ravenpelt on
animals: due to evolution and only the strong survive. everything has evolved to fit the purpose of the food chain.
Earth: result of space dust and particles coming together and forming a mass which eventually turns into magma and then rock. You can't say this isnt true because astronomers have observed different masses at different stages in the development
Ravenpelt on May 31, 2007, 10:50:51 AM
Ravenpelt on
rileywolf on May 31, 2007, 6:06:23 AM
rileywolf on
Ravenpelt on June 1, 2007, 11:52:33 AM
Ravenpelt on
Ravenpelt on May 30, 2007, 11:32:36 AM
Ravenpelt on
Benk on May 30, 2007, 8:33:14 AM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
Ravenpelt on May 30, 2007, 11:32:23 AM
Ravenpelt on
Ravenpelt on May 29, 2007, 9:20:51 AM
Ravenpelt on
rileywolf on May 29, 2007, 10:05:16 AM
rileywolf on
Ravenpelt on May 29, 2007, 7:30:05 AM
Ravenpelt on
1. Genes, DNA, etc exist. you can deny it but they exist and they are the reason things evolve.
2. The bible was not written by god, Jesus, or any of the disciples. they were written at least 50 years after his death.
3. the bible says jesus died, rose from the tomb, talked to people, and then rose up into the heavens. However we know space exists which would mean jesus flew into space.
4. Jesus was supposedly crucified and died within 2 hours. However crucification took days to kill people. It was meant as torture. If they were seen dying they would have been taken off and whipped to torture the victim more.
Nightstorm on May 28, 2007, 9:01:07 AM
Nightstorm on
Ravenpelt on May 29, 2007, 5:31:44 AM
Ravenpelt on
Benk on May 28, 2007, 3:09:15 PM
Benk on
Comment Deleted
Nightstorm on May 28, 2007, 8:04:50 AM
Nightstorm on